|
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE COMPACT
BETWEEN GOVERNOR SCHWARZENEGGER, UC, AND CSU
Q&A
pdf
Q. Why did UC agree to this compact?
A. After several rounds of serious state budget cuts,
the compact with Gov. Schwarzenegger offers much-needed
fiscal stability for the UC system over the next several
years.
Q. What does it do?
A. The compact provides for annual growth in state
funding for UC’s basic budget and enrollment
growth, beginning in the 2005-06 fiscal year, in
exchange for UC’s commitment to accountability
in specified areas. The agreement extends through
the 2010-11 fiscal year.
Q.
Couldn’t UC have achieved more had
it not reached this agreement?
A. The University recognizes that the State of California
continues to face a very serious state budget problem.
Under the circumstances, the compact was judged to
be reasonable. For the longer term, however, the compact
is intended as a floor, not a ceiling, for state funding.
As the state’s economy recovers, additional funding
may be provided for UC activities. The compact is critical
because it demonstrates the importance of higher education
to California and to the Schwarzenegger Administration,
and because it establishes a plan for stabilizing state
funding for the UC system and provides a foundation
for recovery and growth in the future.
Q.
How much of a “guarantee” does
the compact provide in terms of future funding?
A. State funding decisions are made jointly by the
governor and Legislature. This compact is with the
governor and will need the Legislature’s annual
support. However, members of the Legislature have played
a major role this year in placing public higher education
at or near the top of the budget agenda in Sacramento
and had much to do with creating the environment that
made this compact possible. Previous, similar agreements
with other governors were very successful until California
confronted a massive budget crisis of truly historic
proportions. This compact covers a six-year period,
longer than the agreements with other administrations.
Q. Who was involved in the negotiations?
A. Members of the Schwarzenegger administration negotiated
with representatives of the UC Office of the President,
who in turn were advised by a range of campus representatives.
Chancellors, executive vice chancellors, and planning
and budget officers were among those who had input
in the process. Additionally, UC representatives
were guided by budget planning principles adopted
by the Board of Regents. Finally, a variety of budget
input provided by student, staff, and Academic Senate
leadership over the course of the year also helped
guide the University’s decision-making on the
compact.
Q.
How does this agreement address the interests of
students?
A. UC student leaders this year have placed a high
priority on student fees, financial aid, admissions,
and outreach. That input was given serious consideration
in the negotiation of the compact. Under the agreement,
fees will rise, as they do each year at most universities,
but now students will be able to plan for gradual,
moderate, and predictable increases. The compact allows
the University to determine the proportion of new fee
revenue it returns to financial aid – up to 33% – giving
UC an important tool to preserve student access. The
agreement promises a return to providing full access
for California’s growing college-age population
after the enrollment cuts of 2004-05. And, UC commits
in the compact to a specified level of non-state funding
to sustain its outreach programs, and it is believed
that decision makers in Sacramento are open to negotiating
a level of state funding for outreach in the annual
budget process.
Q. And what about faculty and staff?
A. The compact provides annual funding growth of 3%
for salary and other cost increases starting in 2005-06,
growing to 4% annual growth in 2007-08. And more
generally, the compact allows the University to stabilize
its programs and begin to plan for recovery and future
growth, following several years of major state budget
cuts.
Q.
What does the compact mean for UC’s
immediate budget situation?
A. The compact takes effect with the 2005-06 fiscal
year, though it contains a few provisions (such as
student fees) that address 2004-05. Because the State
of California is still facing such a dire budget situation
for 2004-05, the governor’s January proposal
for state support of UC in 2004-05 is not expected
to change dramatically when the May Revision is issued
on May 13. Under the compact, however, that short-term
pain will be followed by long-term gain for state support
of the University of California.
Q. What does California gain from this compact?
A. California benefits from renewed financial stability
in its public higher education system. The renewal
of the state’s commitment to public higher
education means the University of California can
proceed confidently with the teaching, research,
and service activities that have such a dramatic,
demonstrated impact on the economic growth, health,
and quality of life of the entire state. And for
students and parents, predictability in fees and
an end to this year’s significant enrollment
cuts should bring some additional level of comfort.
Q. Where can I provide feedback?
A. President Dynes has a web page where anyone can
send him a comment or idea. Dynes’ Desk, as
it is called, is located at www.universityofcalifornia.edu/president/desk.html.
May 11, 2004
|